Physics configuration is identical to the global model tests.

Control Configuration (SAS)

Microphysics:	Zhao-Carr
Radiation (LW/SW):	RRTMG
Gravity Wave Drag:	Orographic and Convective Gravity Wave Drag
PBL:	Hybrid Eddy-diffusivity Mass-flux Scheme
Deep Convection:	Scale-Aware Simplified Arakawa-Schubert
Shallow Convection:	Mass-Flux based SAS

Test Configuration (GFTEST)

Microphysics:	Zhao-Carr
Radiation (LW/SW):	RRTMG
Gravity Wave Drag:	Orographic and Convective Gravity Wave Drag
PBL:	Hybrid Eddy-diffusivity Mass-flux Scheme
Deep Convection:	Grell-Freitas
Shallow Convection:	Grell-Freitas

Other settings

• When GF is activated, several additional parameters can be set:
    imid = 0 (mid-level clouds turned off)
    ichoice = 0 (deep convection closure option)
    ichoice_s = 2 (shallow convection closure option)
    dicycle = 1 (diurnal cycle adjustment turned on)

ARM TWP-ICE Case (Maritime Deep Convection)

The SCM was configured to run the GCSS Deep Convective Working Group's sixth intercomparison case based on the ARM Tropical Warm Pool - International Cloud Experiment (TWP-ICE) field campaign. Full case specifications can be found here and a paper describing a SCM intercomparison performed in 2011-2012 was written by Davies et al. (2013). Highlights of the case configuration are as follows.

• initial conditions and forcing obtained from field campaign data near Darwin, Australia during January and February 2006
• featured deep convection associated with active phase of monsoon and suppressed convection associated with inactive phase

Case Setup

Initial Conditions:	mean profiles of u, v, T, q over the study area centered on 12.425°S, 130.891°E at 3 UTC on January 19, 2006
Surface:	oceanic, fixed SST
Forcing:	prescribed horizontal advection of T, q prescirbed vertical velocity applied to modeled T, q profiles for vertical advection horizontal momentum relaxed to observed profiles on 2 h timescale
Runtime:	3 UTC on January 19, 2006 to 21 UTC on February 12, 2006

Forcing Ensemble

In addition to a “best estimate” forcing dataset for the time period, a 100-member forcing ensemble supplied by the case coordinators is utilized to gauge sensitivity to the supplied forcing. The forcing ensemble was created by quantifying uncertainty in the surface rainfall measurement and using the constrained variational analysis method to derive 100 equally likely forcing profiles. The largest change among the forcing datasets is in the prescribed vertical velocity, which is very sensitive to surface precipitation.

ARM SGP Summer 1997 Case (Continental Deep Convection)

The SCM was configured to run the GCSS Deep Convective Working Group's third intercomparison case based on the ARM Southern Great Plains Summer 1997 intensive observation period. Full case specifications are from a report by Cederwall et al. (2000) and a paper describing a SCM intercomparison was written by Xie et al. (2002). Highlights of the case configuration are as follows.

• initial conditions and forcing obtained from intensive observation period data over north-central Oklahoma and south-central Kansas during June and July of 1997
• featured periods of deep convection associated with the passing of mesoscale convective systems and isolated storms

Case Setup

Initial Conditions:	mean profiles of u, v, T, q over ARM SGP site
Surface:	continental, specified surface fluxes
Forcing:	prescribed horizontal advection of T, q prescirbed vertical advection of T, q horizontal momentum relaxed to observed profiles based on the large-scale horizontal wind and observational domain lengthscale
Runtime:	Subperiod A:
	2300 UTC on June 26, 1997 to 2300 UTC on June 30, 1997
	Subperiod B:
	2300 UTC on July 7, 1997 to 2300 UTC on July 12, 1997
	Subperiod C:
	2300 UTC on July 12, 1997 to 2300 UTC on July 17, 1997